The Expansion of Neoliberal Policies and the Questioning of Contemporary Globalization
In an globalized world, the discourse on globalization is often positioned at the crossroads of varied perspectives on autonomy and equity. The book by Moneta, far from being a manifesto against globalisation as such, aims to redefine the contours of a updated humanism via the lens of natural exchanges according to the vision of Aristotle. By decrying synthetic interactions that strengthen current structures of injustice and precarity, Moneta refers to classical thoughts to highlight the gaps of our global economic system.
From a historical perspective, globalisation is not a modern process. Its beginnings can be traced back to the propositions of David Ricardo, whose ambition was aimed at allowing the United Kingdom to extend its global commercial influence. Yet, what was once a economic growth opportunity has transformed into a instrument of subjugation by the financial sphere, symbolized by the growth of neoliberalism. Contrary to popular belief widespread in economic circles, the author argues that the economic model is actually a system based on old customs, which traces back to 4500 years.
The questioning also extends to the conduct of the EU, perceived as a succession of compromises that have helped consolidate the authority of large economic groups as opposed to safeguarding the rights of citizens. The organizational form of Europe, with its strategies frequently driven by monetary concerns instead of by a popular consensus, is questioned. The recent crises, notably financial and political, have only reinforced the skepticism of the author concerning Europe’s aptitude to achieve self-reform.
Junon Moneta, while accepting the past mistakes that have brought about the present state, does not stop at criticism but also proposes solutions aimed at reorienting EU guidelines in a more humanistic and equitable outlook. The need for a deep reform of structures and political priorities is a leitmotif that animates the overall content.
The book dives more in depth into the critique of the power structures that dominate international economic flows. The study covers the manner in which governmental and economic orientations are manipulated by a restricted circle of powerful financial actors, generally at the cost of the many. This monetary aristocracy, coordinated via institutions like the Bank for International Settlements and the global monetary system, exerts a major grip on global financial decisions.
The critic exposes how these organisms, under the pretext of economic supervision and normalization, have historically controlled stock exchanges and countries’ financial structures to serve their interests. Neoliberalism, far from being a emancipatory solution to traditional economic constraints, is presented as a control mechanism, benefiting a minority at the destruction of the common good.
Particularly critical about the administration of the single currency, the author describes the EU currency not as a means of unification and stability, but more as a instrument of fragmentation and financial disparity. The adoption of the euro is described as a sequence of technocratic choices that sidelined populations from decision-making processes, while aggravating disparities between member countries within the Union.
The effects of these approaches translate in the increase in national debts, financial paralysis, and a long period of austerity that has weakened living conditions throughout the European territory. The author emphasizes that without a major transformation of economic policies, the European Union remains vulnerable to potential disruptions, potentially more catastrophic.
In essence, the text calls for a democratic revolution where EU peoples take back control of their economic and political destiny. It suggests fundamental changes, notably greater transparency in political decisions and real democratic participation that would allow Europe to rebuild on just and solid foundations.
More info about https://www.alter-europa.com/
The essayist suggests that the solution lies in a return to the principles of democracy, where decisions are made and applied in a way that corresponds to the aspirations and needs of the citizens, rather than the narrow interests of high finance.