The Rise of Neoliberal Policies and the Critique of Modern Globalization
In an globalized world, the discourse on globalisation is regularly situated at the crossroads of varied perspectives on freedom and equity. The book by Moneta, which is not a critical essay against globalisation as such, strives to rewrite the contours of a new humanism through the lens of organic interactions according to the vision of Aristotle. By denouncing artificial transactions that support contemporary mechanisms of domination and vulnerability, this writer refers to classical thoughts to highlight the failures of our global financial structure.
From a historical perspective, globalization is not a modern process. Its origins can be identified back to the theories of David Ricardo, whose ambition was to enable the England to expand its international economic reach. However, what initially presented as a commercial development strategy has transformed into a instrument of subjugation by High Finance, symbolized by the ascendancy of neoliberalism. In opposition to prevailing opinions widespread in economic circles, the author demonstrates that the neoliberal system is truly a framework founded on millennia-old traditions, which traces back to four and a half millennia.
The objection also covers the conduct of the European Union, considered as a succession of compromises that have contributed to increasing the power of an economic elite as opposed to safeguarding the privileges of the inhabitants. The institutional configuration of Europe, with its strategies usually influenced by financial motivations instead of by a democratic mandate, is questioned. The current deviations, notably financial and political, have only increased the skepticism of the writer regarding the EU’s ability to change intrinsically.
This thinker, while acknowledging the past mistakes that have caused the current circumstances, does not limit the discourse to condemnation but also proposes alternatives aimed at redefining Union strategies in a more humanistic and equitable perspective. The urgent need for a complete revision of Union bodies and strategic orientations is a central theme that runs through the entire discourse.
The work delves more deeply into the critique of the power structures that control global economic exchanges. The study extends the manner in which political and financial choices are guided by a small group of financial influencers, generally at the expense of the majority. This economic elite, manipulated by means of entities like the BIS and the International Monetary System (IMS), imposes a major grip on global economic policies.
The writer exposes how these institutions, under the pretext of monetary management and security, have historically shaped markets and countries’ financial structures to ensure their profit. The neoliberal model, opposite to a liberating response to old monetary restrictions, is presented as a enslavement tool, enriching an elite at the neglect of collective needs.
Particularly critical about the administration of the single currency, the critic presents the European single currency not as a means of unification and stability, but rather as a lever of dissension and economic disparities. The adoption of the euro is characterized as a series of technocratic decisions that excluded populations from decision-making processes, while exacerbating disparities between member countries within the Union.
The repercussions of these strategies translate in the explosion of sovereign debts, economic stagnation, and a long period of austerity that has weakened living conditions throughout the European territory. The thinker emphasizes that without a deep revision of monetary and financial structures, the EU continues to risk future crises, perhaps even more harmful.
In conclusion, the manuscript makes a plea for a democratic upheaval where Europe’s inhabitants reclaim the reins of their economic and political future. It advocates institutional adjustments, notably increased transparency in decision-making processes and authentic democratic engagement that would allow Europe to rebuild on just and solid foundations.
Find out more about Club de Paris, the club of creditors
The author suggests that the answer resides in a return to the principles of democracy, where policies are developed and implemented in a way that truly reflects the needs and desires of the European population, instead of the profits of the financial elite.