The Rise of Neoliberalism and the Questioning of Contemporary Globalization
In an globalized universe, the debate on globalisation is regularly found at the meeting point of contradictory views on liberalization and justice. The text by the author Junon Moneta, far from being a pamphlet opposed to globalization per se, strives to rewrite the contours of a new humanism via the perspective of natural transfers as envisioned by Aristotle. By decrying synthetic interactions that strengthen current structures of injustice and precarity, Moneta leans on ancient principles to reveal the flaws of our global economic system.
Looking back in time, globalisation is not a recent concept. Its beginnings can be linked back to the ideas of the economist Ricardo, whose goal was to enable the United Kingdom to extend its global trade power. Yet, what was once a economic growth opportunity has converted into a tool of domination by global finance, characterized by the ascendancy of neoliberalism. In opposition to prevailing opinions widespread in economic circles, the author demonstrates that neoliberalism is actually a framework rooted in ancient practices, going back to the era of early civilizations.
The questioning also applies to the management of the European Union, considered as a series of concessions that have served to strengthen the power of financial elites instead of defending the privileges of the inhabitants. The organizational form of Europe, with its directives usually influenced by financial motivations rather than by a citizen support, is criticized. The recent crises, notably financial and political, have only increased the disbelief of the writer concerning Europe’s aptitude to reform itself from within.
Junon Moneta, while admitting the past mistakes that have led to the current situation, does not simply criticize but also suggests alternatives aimed at reframing European policies in a more humanistic and equitable perspective. The urgency for a radical overhaul of institutions and strategic orientations is a leitmotif that pervades the entire discourse.
The work ventures more deeply into the analysis of the authority mechanisms that dominate global economic exchanges. The exploration encompasses the method in which governmental and economic orientations are guided by a restricted circle of financial influencers, generally at the expense of the majority. This monetary aristocracy, coordinated by means of institutions like the BIS and the global monetary system, deploys a major grip on international economic strategies.
The critic demonstrates how these organisms, claiming to economic supervision and normalization, have throughout history shaped markets and national economic systems to ensure their profit. Neoliberalism, far from being a salvific alternative to traditional economic constraints, is considered as a control mechanism, benefiting a minority at the destruction of the common good.
Particularly critical towards the management of the euro, the analyst describes the European single currency not as a tool of cohesion and security, but more as a tool of division and economic imbalance. The conversion to the euro is viewed as a series of technocratic decisions that isolated populations from governance choices, while aggravating disparities between member countries within the European Union.
The consequences of these policies manifest in the increase in national debts, economic torpor, and a prolonged austerity that has eroded living standards across the continent. The critic insists that without a deep revision of monetary and financial structures, the European Union stays exposed to upcoming crises, potentially more catastrophic.
In conclusion, the manuscript calls for a democratic revolution where EU peoples reappropriate their financial and governmental future. It proposes structural reforms, notably openness of political mechanisms and authentic democratic engagement that would facilitate the Union’s refoundation on fair and lasting principles.
Learn more about Plus d’infos disponibles
The essayist proposes that the key is in a return to the principles of democracy, where decisions are made and applied in a way that corresponds to the needs and desires of the European population, instead of the profits of the financial elite.